bidsmith vs Google Ads Editor
Both tools let you bulk-edit Google Ads without clicking through the web UI one field at a time. They solve overlapping problems, and most teams will use both. Here’s how they compare.
The side-by-side
| Google Ads Editor | bidsmith | |
|---|---|---|
| Source of truth | Your last download. Gets stale the moment someone else edits the account. | A Git repository everyone shares. Always current. |
| History | You see your own pending changes. Past edits are gone once posted. | Every change is a Git commit. Years of history, searchable. |
| Review before posting | You see your own diff. Nobody else does. | Open a pull request. Teammates review and comment before anything ships. |
| Undo | Undo a pending change locally. Once posted, the only undo is editing manually. | git revert <commit> → bidsmith apply. Five seconds. |
| Concurrent edits | First one to post wins; the other has to re-download and reconcile by hand. | Git merges the edits. Conflicts are visible and resolvable. |
| Bulk find-and-replace | Excellent. The UI is the strongest part of the Editor. | Works — it’s just text, so any editor’s find-and-replace does it. Slightly less ergonomic for ad-hoc bulk edits. |
| Reporting and inspection | Limited. Use the web UI. | Not at all. Use the web UI. |
| Search-term reports, recommendations, audit insights | Read-only views in the Editor; rich in the web UI. | Not bidsmith’s job. Use the web UI. |
| Reproducibility | A posted change is a snapshot in time. There’s no way to ask “what did this account look like in March?” | Yes — every state the account has been in is a Git commit you can check out. |
| Automation / CI | Not designed for it. | First-class. Run bidsmith plan in a GitHub Action on every PR. |
| Learning curve | Familiar Google Ads vocabulary, dropdown menus, point-and-click. | New file format and a few terminal commands. Steeper for one person; flatter for a team of five. |
| Works offline | Yes. | Editing and validate yes. plan and apply need the Google Ads API. |
When to use what
Reach for Google Ads Editor when:
- You’re doing a one-time bulk edit and don’t need a record of who/why.
- You’re inspecting performance, search-terms, recommendations.
- You’re new to the account and want to poke around interactively.
- You’re the only one editing the account and changes are infrequent.
Reach for bidsmith when:
- More than one person edits the same account.
- You need an audit trail (“who set that bid, and why?”).
- You want a teammate to review a change before it goes live.
- You want a CI pipeline to run
planon every PR and catch mistakes. - You’re managing five, ten, or fifty similar campaigns and want to generate them from a template instead of duplicating in the UI.
- You ever need to roll back a change cleanly.
They’re not mutually exclusive
Most teams will:
- Use bidsmith for the config of their account — campaigns, ad groups, keywords, budgets, shared sets, conversion actions.
- Use the Google Ads web UI for everything else — reports, recommendations, search-term review, day-to-day monitoring.
- Use Google Ads Editor for one-off exploratory bulk edits, then
run
bidsmith refreshafterwards to bring the changes back into Git.
What about the API directly?
If you’re a developer and you’d happily write Python scripts that call the Google Ads API — you can. But that’s exactly the gap bidsmith fills:
- Your scripts have no diff between “what I want” and “what’s there.” You write imperative code: create this, update that. bidsmith is declarative: here’s what should exist.
- Your scripts have no built-in plan/apply preview. bidsmith does.
- Your scripts aren’t reviewable as a clean diff in a PR. A
.bidfile is.
bidsmith is what you’d build if you wrote those scripts five times and got tired of writing them.
Next up
- How the workflow looks day-to-day — the end-to-end picture.
- Install bidsmith — when you’re ready to try it.